Skip to main content

My Stance on Machiavelli's Theory of Political Leadership

My Stance on Machiavelli's Theory of Political Leadership


Niccolò Machiavelli was an Italian born political philosopher, most well-known for having written The Prince. His book The Prince deals with the place of morality in leadership and the most important qualities to have in a leader. Many find his views to be overly pessimistic and even evil; however, I believe that although I don’t think a more Utopian society is impossible, that a history of fascist regimes since him, proves that he had some viable points.

The Prince is a short treatise on how to acquire power, create a state, and keep it. It can be summed up in a few guiding principles. First, as a leader, it is better to be feared than loved, and there is nothing worse than to be hated. Next, Machiavelli argues that you must be both a lion and a fox. By this, he uses the lion to symbolize the qualities of strength, respect, and willing to use physical force when necessary. The fox is used to symbolize cunning, cleverness, and diplomacy. He argues that a ruler must be both a fox and a lion “in order to recognize traps” and “frighten off wolves.” Lastly, Machiavelli believed that it is important for leaders to possess a great deal of knowledge. He stresses the importance of reading history, studying war, knowing your own land, and avoiding anyone that flatters- because they cannot be trusted.

I believe that Machiavelli’s views on political leadership are pessimistic and do not give the people much credit. I think that his level of dictatorial control and manipulation would only be necessary in a completely uncivilized nation. I feel similarly about his use of force and military dependence, and believe that a more civilized state would look more like a democracy and would value the wit of leaders more than anything else; however, I don’t believe that this is commonplace in most societies and that the leadership qualities and tricks laid out by Macchiavelli have been employed by numerous successful leaders throughout history. Some examples of these include: dictators like Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin-who relied primarily on fear and military force to obtain and maintain power. There is no doubt that Niccolò Machiavelli’s societal views are egregious and can be hard to swallow; however, sometimes the truth hurts. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beginners Guide to PTSD and C-PTSD

Beginners Guide to PTSD and C-PTSD Post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD is a neurodegenerative disorder whose origin is rooted in an experience or experiences of trauma. Similar in symptoms and causes, complex post-traumatic stress disorder is a subset of this disorder whose symptoms are, generally speaking, more severe. Although many experience traumatic events in their lives and some even experience symptoms of PTSD following them, this disorder is not widely spread, and, unfortunately, is widely misunderstood. That's where this beginner's guide to PTSD and C-PTSD will be helpful. Some form of PTSD affects about 4% of adults, with the number of women being higher than that of men. This could be, at least in part, due to the negative social stigma surrounding men seeking help and expressing their feelings. Its origin is a traumatic event, one or multiple, that can come at any point in life. With C-PTSD, it's always rooted in childhood trauma and of a repetitive nature-me...

Philosophers: Emile Durkheim

Émile Durkheim Émile Durkheim was a French Sociologist  who is best known as the principal architect of modern social science and is widely regarded as the founder of the French School of Sociology. Some of his major works include the Division of Labour in Society, the Rules of the Sociological Method, Suicide, Pedagogical Evolution in France, and The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.   His most notable work is called Suicide and is largely about how capitalism robs humans of their happiness until they reach the point of craving death.  In this book, he outlines 5 reason that humans are so unhappy 1. Individualism The first reason he outlines, is that in a society of capitalism, there is too much pressure on the individual. Before capitalism, roles were assigned at birth. Now-with competition-there's more pressure on the individual and uncertainty in the work that you'll do and the life you will live. With this uncertainty, stress is put on the individual that coul...

Parenting Styles

  Parenting Styles For some parents, their style of parenting feels more like knee-jerk reactions and doing what they have to do to make it through the day. As much as each parent and family is unique, however, parenting styles are typically seen as best fitting into one of 4 categories. These categories are separated by differences in degree of warmth and demand, among others, and can lead to different benefits and setbacks for the child later in life. Of course, no parenting style is perfect, and choosing one can be a vital early step in the lives of new parents. For this reason, I've outlined the 4 major categories of parenting types with explanations here, as well as some of the pros and cons associated with each. Permissive Permissive parenting is characterized by the least expectations and avoiding confrontation with the child. This style ranks high in warmth, but low in levels of demand. These parents are very stand-off in their approach, and often allow their child nearly f...